Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add labels to namespaces created during end to end tests #2340

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2020
Merged

Add labels to namespaces created during end to end tests #2340

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2020

Conversation

fgiloux
Copy link
Contributor

@fgiloux fgiloux commented Apr 6, 2020

Besides that it is a good practice to label resources created this allows in this case easy deletion of the namespaces if:

  • there was an issue while running the tests
  • the variable TEST_KEEP_NAMESPACES was set
  • the tests were abruptly stopped by the developer

Currently you have to run something like:
$ kubectl get namespaces --no-headers=true -o custom-columns=:metadata.name | grep arendelle | xargs kubectl delete namespace
This would become:
$ kubectl delete ns -l "tekton.dev/test-e2e=true"

Changes

Changes are minimal:

  • a few lines added to test/init_test.go and test/v1alpha1/init_test.go

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Besides that it is a good practice to label resources created this allows in this case easy deletion of the namespaces if:
- there was an issue while running the tests
- the variable TEST_KEEP_NAMESPACES was set
- the tests were abruptly stopped by the developer

Currently you have to run something like:
$ kubectl get namespaces --no-headers=true -o custom-columns=:metadata.name | grep arendelle | xargs kubectl delete namespace
This would become:
$ kubectl delete ns -l "tekton.dev/test-e2e=true"
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Apr 6, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 6, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @fgiloux. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 7, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 7, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 7, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

1 similar comment
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@dibyom
Copy link
Member

dibyom commented Apr 7, 2020

Neat!

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit b5ec5f8 into tektoncd:master Apr 7, 2020
@afrittoli afrittoli added the kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. label Apr 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants